Does MISP matter?

Will it really fix fragmentation with only 6 EU members ?

· European Capital Market

Summary of article

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-misp-matters-europes-savings-investments-union-jens-schulte-jhonc/

Schulte argues that Europe's competitiveness hinges on mobilizing capital more effectively — not because Europe lacks savings, but because its capital markets remain fragmented (EU stock market cap sits at 73% of GDP vs. 270% in the US). He frames the recent MISP agreement among Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, and the Netherlands as an encouraging sign of political will to fix that fragmentation.

Writing from a CFO's perspective, he sees the stakes as going beyond regulatory technicalities: efficient capital markets mean easier cross-border investment, deeper liquidity, and a stronger ability to fund strategic priorities. He highlights the proposed "EU Inc." framework — a single harmonized EU corporate regime enabling companies to be founded digitally in as little as 48 hours — as a concrete step toward making Europe easier to build and scale businesses in.

He also points to MISP's push for more transparent, efficient post-trade infrastructure (trading venues, CCPs, depositories, settlement systems) and its recognition of distributed ledger technology as an opportunity for Europe to modernize market infrastructure, provided innovation stays balanced with investor protection.

Quoting German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil's warning that Europe can't afford to move too slowly, Schulte closes on the same note: integrated capital markets aren't just a regulatory goal but a strategic necessity for Europe's growth and autonomy — "a more integrated Europe will be a stronger Europe."